STRONG
强引：直接蕴含 Strong: directly entailed
片段明确写出同一对象、数值与条件，并有精确定位。 The passage states the same object, value, and condition with a precise locator.
01 · 有链接，不等于有证据
01 · A link is not yet evidence
回答末尾列了三篇文档，但“标准版 30 天”到底被哪一行支持，你能一键找到吗？ The answer lists three documents, but can you jump directly to the line supporting “Standard — 30 days”?
02 主张检查器：点一句，看证据落点 Claim Inspector: Click a Sentence, See Its Evidence Landing
逐主张检查 claim-level check
当前状态
Current status
✓
强支持
strong support
定位粒度
Locator granularity
§4.2
条款级
clause-level
支持词
Supporting words
8
命中片段
matched span
回答主张
Answer claims
来源片段
Source passage
03 四种引用状态必须分开 Keep Four Citation States Distinct
支持 · 范围 · 方向 · 缺失 support · scope · direction · absenceWEAK
弱引：范围过宽 Weak: scope is too broad
证据只支持标准版，却被主张扩大为“所有商品”。 Evidence supports only Standard but the claim expands it to “every product.”
WRONG
错引：证据相反 Wrong: evidence contradicts
特价版片段写 7 天，却被主张说成 30 天。 The sale-model passage says seven days while the claim says thirty.
MISSING
无引：没有落点 Missing: no evidence landing
“免运费”没有任何片段支持，不能用整页链接蒙混。 No passage supports “free shipping”; a whole-page link cannot conceal that.
04 最小机制：支持关系与定位缺一不可 Minimal Mechanism: Entailment and Location Are Both Required
valid = entail ∧ locatevalid(c,e) = supports(e,c) ∧ locator(e)
主张 c 必须被片段 e 支持，且 e
必须能定位到版本、章节、段落或行；“来源首页”不是足够细的落点。
Claim c must be supported by passage e, and e must resolve to a
version, section, paragraph, or line. A source homepage is not
precise enough.
拆出原子主张
Extract atomic claims
对象 + 数值 + 条件
object + value + condition
检查证据方向
Check evidence direction
支持、弱化或矛盾
support, partial, or contradiction
保存精确定位
Store exact locator
v3 §4.2 · L18–20
05 边界实验：用来源首页替代证据片段 Boundary Test: Replace a Passage with the Source Homepage
主动制造失败 Create a failure给“免运费”挂一个官网链接 Attach the official site to “free shipping”
来源看起来权威，却没有任何段落写“退货免运费”。权威来源不能替代主张级支持。 The source looks authoritative, but no passage says “return shipping is free.” Source authority cannot replace claim-level support.
尚未执行。当前 C1 有条款级强支持。
Not run yet. C1 currently has strong clause-level support.
✗ 答案末尾有来源列表就够了。
A source list at the end is enough.
→ ✓ 每个可核查主张都要连接到支持片段。
Every checkable claim needs a supporting passage.
✗ 权威来源一定支持这句话。
An authoritative source must support the sentence.
→ ✓ 还要检查具体片段是否蕴含主张。
The specific passage must still entail the claim.
✗ 同主题片段就是正确引用。
A same-topic passage is a correct citation.
→ ✓ 主题相关可能仍是弱引或错引。
Topical relation may still be weak or contradictory.
06 · 一句话带走
06 · One line to keep