元数据过滤 · 先限定可用范围,再谈相关性Metadata Filtering · Establish Eligibility Before Ranking
Relevance
department + date + version + permission → narrowed candidate pool →
relevance scoring
元数据过滤(Metadata
Filtering)按时间、权限、版本或业务字段先限制可检索文档范围。相关但无权、过期或错版本的证据仍不可用。Metadata filtering narrows retrievable documents by time, permission,
version, or business fields. Relevant but unauthorized, stale, or
wrong-version evidence remains unusable.
01 · 最像答案的文件,却不该给你看01 · The best match you are not allowed to read
一份法务文件相关性 98
分,但你只有财务权限;检索系统应该先把它拿来排名,还是在排名前锁住?A legal document scores 98 for relevance, but you have finance-only
access. Should retrieval rank it first—or lock it before
ranking?
▾→🔒
02勾选部门、日期与版本,先收缩候选池再算相关性,越权文档始终锁定Filter by Department, Date, and Version Before Relevance Scoring;
Keep Unauthorized Documents Locked
过滤先于排序 · 权限不可覆盖filter before rank · permission stays binding
状态 AMetric A
—
—
状态 BMetric B
—
—
状态 CMetric C
—
—
所有概率、命中率、得分与输出均为固定种子的教学模拟,不代表真实模型。拖回主变量即可复核结论。All probabilities, hit rates, scores, and outputs are fixed-seed
teaching simulations, not real model output. Move the main
variable back to verify the conclusion.
03把刚才的变化拆成 4 个零件Break the Change into Four Parts
Metadata Filtering
METADATA
业务元数据Business metadata
部门、日期、版本描述适用范围。Department, date, and version define applicability.
POOL
候选池Candidate pool
只有匹配元数据的文档进入下一阶段。Only metadata matches enter the next stage.
PERMISSION
权限门Permission gate
越权文档即使相关也保持锁定。Unauthorized documents remain locked even when relevant.
RELEVANCE
相关性排序Relevance ranking
只在获授权候选中计算和排序。Scoring and ranking operate only on authorized candidates.
04最小机制:主交互能逐项验证Minimal Mechanism: Verify Each Link in the Interaction
MECHANISM
rankable = metadata_match ∧ permission_allowed
三个勾选框只改变 metadata_match;文档 C 的
permission_allowed 永远为
false,因此它不会进入右侧排序。The three checkboxes change only metadata_match. Document C keeps
permission_allowed = false and never enters ranking.
收缩范围Narrow scope部门 + 日期 + 版本department + date + version
执行授权Authorize越权保持锁定unauthorized stays locked
计算相关性Score relevance只排可用候选rank eligible candidates only
05清空所有过滤器,尝试让高相关越权文档进入排序Clear Every Filter and Try to Rank a Highly Relevant Unauthorized
Document
主动制造失败Create a failure
边界实验Boundary experiment
元数据筛选放宽不等于权限放宽。文档 C
会回到审计池,但仍不能进入相关性排序或回答。Relaxing metadata does not relax authorization. Document C
returns to the audit pool but remains excluded from ranking and
answers.
尚未执行。先在主交互中观察正常机制。Not run yet. Observe the normal mechanism in the main interaction
first.
✗ 相关性最高的文档应该优先返回。The most relevant document should always rank
first.→ ✓ 先满足权限、时间和版本,再谈相关性。Permission, time, and version eligibility come before
relevance.
✗ 取消部门过滤就等于获得跨部门权限。Clearing department filters grants cross-department
access.→ ✓ 过滤范围与授权是两道独立门。Filtering and authorization are separate gates.
✗ 只在生成答案时检查权限即可。Permission checks can wait until answer
generation.→ ✓ 越权内容不应先暴露给排序或模型上下文。Unauthorized content should not reach ranking or model context
first.
06 · 一句话带走06 · One line to keep
元数据过滤先用部门、日期和版本缩小候选池,再只对获授权文档计算相关性;高相关分永远不能覆盖权限锁。Metadata filtering narrows candidates by department, date, and
version, then scores only authorized documents. A high relevance
score can never override the permission lock.