01 · EVIDENCE
证据片段 Evidence snippets
三片来源各自支持一个可核查主张；移走后，来源本身不会被模型自动补回。 Three source snippets each support one checkable claim. Removing one does not make the source magically return.
01 · 先从日常问题开始
01 · Start with an everyday question
同事讲得特别顺，却拿不出关键文件——你会因为语气自信就签字吗？ A colleague sounds completely confident but cannot produce the key document. Would you approve on tone alone?
02 移走关键证据，盯住不断线的流畅度 Remove Key Evidence and Watch Fluency Stay Intact
拖动保留证据数 drag evidence count
语言流畅度
Fluency
—
style score
锚定主张
Anchored claims
—
of 3 claims
无锚点警报
No-anchor alerts
—
claim-level
03 四个零件解释“为什么仍像真的” Four Parts Explain Why It Still Sounds Plausible
把刚才的变化拆开 Map the change to parts02 · CLAIM
可核查主张 Checkable claims
回答里的日期、数量和归因需要逐项检查，而不是给整段文字一个绿色勾。 Dates, quantities, and attributions need claim-level checks, not one green tick for an entire paragraph.
03 · FLUENCY
语言流畅度 Fluency
句子是否顺滑与是否有依据是两条轴；流畅度可以在证据断开后保持很高。 Smooth language and factual support are separate axes. Fluency may stay high after evidence disappears.
04 · ALARM
无锚点警报 No-anchor alarm
只要主张没有来源连接，就明确降级，不用语气自信替代证据。 Any claim without a source link is downgraded explicitly; confident tone never substitutes for evidence.
04 最小机制：流畅度不参与证据计数 Minimal Mechanism: Fluency Is Not Evidence
anchor rate = linked / 3anchor rate = linked claims / 3
本页固定三个主张。每移走一片关键证据，就断开一条主张—来源连接；流畅度分数故意保持不变。
This lab fixes three claims. Each removed source breaks one
claim-to-source link while the fluency score deliberately stays
unchanged.
生成句子
Generate sentence
语言模式保持顺滑
language pattern stays smooth
核对主张
Check each claim
逐项寻找来源
look for a source per claim
断线就报警
Warn on broken link
不把语气当证据
never treat tone as evidence
05 边界实验：证据清空后仍给整段绿灯 Boundary Test: Keep the Paragraph Green with No Evidence
主动制造失败 Create a failure制造一个“流畅但零锚点”的回答 Create a fluent answer with zero anchors
一键移走三片证据。若系统仍只看语言质量，这段回答会显得完全正常；逐主张检查则会亮出三个警报。 Remove all three sources. A style-only check still sees a normal answer, while claim-level checking raises three warnings.
尚未执行。先在上方改变主变量。
Not run yet. Change the main variable above first.
✗ 写得顺，所以大概率是真的。
It reads smoothly, so it is probably true.
→ ✓ 流畅度与证据支持分开测。
Measure fluency and support separately.
✗ 整段有一个引用就算有依据。
One citation supports the whole paragraph.
→ ✓ 每个可核查主张都要有对应来源。
Every checkable claim needs its own source.
✗ 删掉证据后继续显示绿色。
Keep the claim green after its source is removed.
→ ✓ 连接断开就降为“未证实”。
Downgrade to unverified when the link breaks.
06 · 一句话带走
06 · One line to keep